TokenCalc AI
Head-to-Head Architectural Faceoff (2026 Live)

Grok 4.7 vs Qwen 2.5 72B

Compare Grok 4.7 vs Qwen 2.5 72B API pricing, token costs, context windows, and latency. See which model is cheaper and better for your stack.

AI Overview & Search Executive Summary

Grok 4.7 charges $2.00/1M input and $6.00/1M output tokens, compared to Qwen 2.5 72B at $0.35/1M input and $0.40/1M output. Qwen 2.5 72B is 5.7x cheaper on input tokens. In reasoning benchmarks, Grok 4.7 holds the higher AA Intelligence Index rating. For latency-critical streaming, throughput figures are not yet measured for at least one of these models.

Overall Winner
Qwen 2.5 72B
Best Price/IQ Balance
Budget Winner
Qwen 2.5 72B
Qwen 2.5 72B is 5.7x cheaper on input tokens
Coding & Logic
Grok 4.7
Higher Benchmark Rating
Context Window
Grok 4.7
Larger Document Context

Full Metric & Specification Comparison

MetricGrok 4.7Qwen 2.5 72BAdvantage
ProviderxAIAlibaba-
Input Token Cost (1M)$2.000$0.350Qwen 2.5 72B
Output Token Cost (1M)$6.000$0.400Qwen 2.5 72B
Context Window500k tokens128k tokensGrok 4.7
AA Intelligence Index35/100UnratedUnrated
Streaming LatencyModerateUnrated-

Key Architectural Takeaways

  • Input Token Cost: Grok 4.7 is $2.00/1M vs Qwen 2.5 72B at $0.35/1M
  • Output Token Cost: Grok 4.7 is $6.00/1M vs Qwen 2.5 72B at $0.40/1M
  • Context Window: Grok 4.7 supports 500k tokens vs Qwen 2.5 72B with 128k tokens
  • Benchmark Intelligence Rating: not rated for one or both models
  • Inference Latency: Grok 4.7 is rated Moderate vs Qwen 2.5 72B rated null
Interactive Head-to-Head Simulator

Calculate Your Team's Exact Bill Difference

Drag the sliders below to see real-time cost divergences based on your daily token consumption.

Daily Input Tokens500,000 tokens
10k1M5M10M+
Daily Output Tokens250,000 tokens
5k500k2M5M+
Grok 4.7xAI
$75.00/mo
$2.00/1M in · $6.00/1M out
IQ Score35/100
Throughput72 t/s
Context500k
Qwen 2.5 72BAlibaba
89.0% Lower Cost
$8.25/mo
$0.35/1M in · $0.40/1M out
IQ ScoreUnrated
Throughput— t/s
Context128k
Net Financial Advantage

Deploying Qwen 2.5 72B over Grok 4.7 saves $66.75/mo ($801/yr) at this volume.

See all Grok 4.7 alternatives →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Grok 4.7 cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B?

Qwen 2.5 72B is significantly more economical, charging $0.35/1M input compared to $2.00/1M for Grok 4.7.

Which model should I choose for production?

If your primary constraint is API cost and high query throughput, choose Qwen 2.5 72B. If you require peak reasoning accuracy and complex tool use, Grok 4.7 is recommended.

How does context window compare between Grok 4.7 and Qwen 2.5 72B?

Grok 4.7 offers the larger context window (500k tokens), allowing you to pass significantly larger codebases or documents without chunking.

Email, Slack, or Discord Price Alerts

Never Miss an AI Token Price Cut

Choose which providers to follow. When an alert is dispatched, it is sent through the configured email or webhook provider; the brief below is displayed on this page only.

Target:
Zero Spam•Unsubscribe in 1-click•Enterprise & Webhook support•View Alert Hub & Past Bulletins →