TokenCalc AI
Head-to-Head Architectural Faceoff (2026 Live)

DeepSeek Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)

Compare DeepSeek Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) API pricing, token costs, context windows, and latency. See which model is cheaper and better for your stack.

AI Overview & Search Executive Summary

DeepSeek Flash charges $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens, compared to Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) at $0.59/1M input and $0.79/1M output. DeepSeek Flash is 3.9x cheaper on input tokens. In reasoning benchmarks, DeepSeek Flash holds the higher AA Intelligence Index rating. For latency-critical streaming, throughput figures are not yet measured for at least one of these models.

Overall Winner
DeepSeek Flash
Best Price/IQ Balance
Budget Winner
DeepSeek Flash
DeepSeek Flash is 3.9x cheaper on input tokens
Coding & Logic
DeepSeek Flash
Higher Benchmark Rating
Context Window
DeepSeek Flash
Larger Document Context

Full Metric & Specification Comparison

MetricDeepSeek FlashLlama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)Advantage
ProviderDeepSeekMeta-
Input Token Cost (1M)$0.150$0.590DeepSeek Flash
Output Token Cost (1M)$0.600$0.790DeepSeek Flash
Context Window1,000k tokens128k tokensDeepSeek Flash
AA Intelligence Index33/100UnratedUnrated
Streaming LatencyFastUnrated-

Key Architectural Takeaways

  • Input Token Cost: DeepSeek Flash is $0.15/1M vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) at $0.59/1M
  • Output Token Cost: DeepSeek Flash is $0.60/1M vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) at $0.79/1M
  • Context Window: DeepSeek Flash supports 1,000k tokens vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) with 128k tokens
  • Benchmark Intelligence Rating: not rated for one or both models
  • Inference Latency: DeepSeek Flash is rated Fast vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) rated null
Interactive Head-to-Head Simulator

Calculate Your Team's Exact Bill Difference

Drag the sliders below to see real-time cost divergences based on your daily token consumption.

Daily Input Tokens500,000 tokens
10k1M5M10M+
Daily Output Tokens250,000 tokens
5k500k2M5M+
DeepSeek FlashDeepSeek
54.3% Lower Cost
$6.75/mo
$0.15/1M in · $0.60/1M out
IQ Score33/100
Throughput170 t/s
Context1000k
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)Meta
$14.78/mo
$0.59/1M in · $0.79/1M out
IQ ScoreUnrated
Throughput— t/s
Context128k
Net Financial Advantage

Deploying DeepSeek Flash over Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) saves $8.03/mo ($96/yr) at this volume.

See all Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together) alternatives →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DeepSeek Flash cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)?

DeepSeek Flash is significantly more economical, charging $0.15/1M input compared to $0.59/1M for Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together).

Which model should I choose for production?

If your primary constraint is API cost and high query throughput, choose DeepSeek Flash. If you require peak reasoning accuracy and complex tool use, DeepSeek Flash is recommended.

How does context window compare between DeepSeek Flash and Llama 3.3 70B (Groq/Together)?

DeepSeek Flash offers the larger context window (1,000k tokens), allowing you to pass significantly larger codebases or documents without chunking.

Email, Slack, or Discord Price Alerts

Never Miss an AI Token Price Cut

Choose which providers to follow. When an alert is dispatched, it is sent through the configured email or webhook provider; the brief below is displayed on this page only.

Target:
Zero Spam•Unsubscribe in 1-click•Enterprise & Webhook support•View Alert Hub & Past Bulletins →