TokenCalc AI
Head-to-Head Architectural Faceoff (2026 Live)

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7

Compare Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7 API pricing, token costs, context windows, and latency. See which model is cheaper and better for your stack.

AI Overview & Search Executive Summary

Claude Fable 5.1 charges $10.00/1M input and $50.00/1M output tokens, compared to Grok 4.7 at $2.00/1M input and $6.00/1M output. Grok 4.7 is 5.0x cheaper on input tokens. In reasoning benchmarks, Claude Fable 5.1 holds the higher AA Intelligence Index rating (49/100). For latency-critical streaming, Claude Fable 5.1 delivers 88 t/s (155.0s TTFT) while Grok 4.7 provides 72 t/s (43.0s TTFT).

Overall Winner
Claude Fable 5.1
Best Price/IQ Balance
Budget Winner
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is 5.0x cheaper on input tokens
Coding & Logic
Claude Fable 5.1
Higher Benchmark Rating
Context Window
Claude Fable 5.1
Larger Document Context

Full Metric & Specification Comparison

MetricClaude Fable 5.1Grok 4.7Advantage
ProviderAnthropicxAI-
Input Token Cost (1M)$10.000$2.000Grok 4.7
Output Token Cost (1M)$50.000$6.000Grok 4.7
Context Window1,000k tokens500k tokensClaude Fable 5.1
AA Intelligence Index49/10035/100Claude Fable 5.1
Streaming LatencyModerateModerate-

Key Architectural Takeaways

  • Input Token Cost: Claude Fable 5.1 is $10.00/1M vs Grok 4.7 at $2.00/1M
  • Output Token Cost: Claude Fable 5.1 is $50.00/1M vs Grok 4.7 at $6.00/1M
  • Context Window: Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1,000k tokens vs Grok 4.7 with 500k tokens
  • Benchmark Intelligence Rating: Claude Fable 5.1 scores 49/100 vs Grok 4.7 at 35/100 (AA Index v5)
  • Inference Latency: Claude Fable 5.1 is rated Moderate vs Grok 4.7 rated Moderate
Interactive Head-to-Head Simulator

Calculate Your Team's Exact Bill Difference

Drag the sliders below to see real-time cost divergences based on your daily token consumption.

Daily Input Tokens500,000 tokens
10k1M5M10M+
Daily Output Tokens250,000 tokens
5k500k2M5M+
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
$525.00/mo
$10.00/1M in · $50.00/1M out
IQ Score49/100
Throughput88 t/s
Context1000k
Grok 4.7xAI
85.7% Lower Cost
$75.00/mo
$2.00/1M in · $6.00/1M out
IQ Score35/100
Throughput72 t/s
Context500k
Net Financial Advantage

Deploying Grok 4.7 over Claude Fable 5.1 saves $450.00/mo ($5400/yr) at this volume.

See all Claude Fable 5.1 alternatives →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 cheaper than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is significantly more economical, charging $2.00/1M input compared to $10.00/1M for Claude Fable 5.1.

Which model should I choose for production?

If your primary constraint is API cost and high query throughput, choose Grok 4.7. If you require peak reasoning accuracy and complex tool use, Claude Fable 5.1 is recommended.

How does context window compare between Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 4.7?

Claude Fable 5.1 offers the larger context window (1,000k tokens), allowing you to pass significantly larger codebases or documents without chunking.

Email, Slack, or Discord Price Alerts

Never Miss an AI Token Price Cut

Choose which providers to follow. When an alert is dispatched, it is sent through the configured email or webhook provider; the brief below is displayed on this page only.

Target:
Zero Spam•Unsubscribe in 1-click•Enterprise & Webhook support•View Alert Hub & Past Bulletins →